1 matches
 Here you go, nothing beats the power of nature. But, promise, it won't happen again. At least not for this one. Thanks.
1 matches
not bad.. im more of a techy guy though, that's too much nature for me ;)
did you say you ar eusing PainShop Pro?
1 matches
I'd be extremely grateful if someone could identify this font for my wedding invitation. While it's calligraphic swash in nature, it has a little attitude and more our style than Snell Roundhand, etc.! Thank you in advance.
1 matches
Thanks for your trouble..."Jana" looks like the one...I'm going to make it be the one! I will read the readme file.
That's the nature of the embroidery business...crayon drawings...crummy scans...a lot of searching (trying to match a font) with hardly any info to go on...all for a friend of a friend of a friend................
Thanks again!
~JF
1 matches
 g'day all,
the internet has failed me so far on this one - I'm looking for a font that matches the way ship's names are painted on their hull. I have no doubt that there are plenty of variations, but the image I've uploaded is typical. Note the flatttened O & S characters, and the generally bold nature of the font. I've tried elsewhere to ID it with no luck. Any help much appreciated, as I'd really like to use it on a CD cover and I don't have the experience in making my own fonts.
1 matches
? Hi Guys, great site, hope you can help.
We've used Stone Sans as our corporate typeface for a few years and while we love it, we would like to use a new typeface for our new ID.
We love the sans serif nature of Stone while still having some variation in line width and unique shapes like the lower case 'k'.
Can you guys recommend or suggest any alternatives that we should try. We are a design studio so want something fresh, but not too modern that it looks like we've just graduated and don't know type yet!
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
1 matches
The Bolton family are payware?
I found a page -- well-set-up, too, not the look of one that'll be torn down any second -- on which a person who claimed to be the designer offered up the whole family. For free, of course.
Damn, now it's time to get all disillusioned about Human Nature again. Sure, everyone offers fonts for free ("because I know you'll never use it for commercial stuff"), but claiming to be the designer? That's just wrong, wrong, wrong.
I'll go Google it now. Maybe I'm mistaken -- I hope so.
***
Googled, and found the site. Still there, still claiming to be him, and I've gotta say it looks genuine. (Select "Bolton" from the upper drop-down to see it in use and DL the *.zip file.)
1 matches
Ivan, see the other jessica thread. Philippe at WTF came up with the same. And I think he is most probably right when it comes to it that the logo shown at WFT has it's roots in the Flange. Philippe is almost never wrong.
Jessica comes up with yet another image all the time. The first two, of which I deleted one, were too muddy to make a proper ID. Then she came up with this - sharper - one but in the mean time the question had been answered at WTF which lead to the other discussion here.
So everyone agrees on the Flange. OK with me. But in the bigger logo shown on WTF:
[img]http://wtf.myfonts.com/images/e0/e0ed35bbfacfcf7c570fb7ebadf66fd8.39170.jpeg[/img]
and the logo used on the Thomas & Friends website forbids. A, M, S!!! ampersand and R I do not consider a match. And the rest is doubtful. But, you know, I am just a cat - so I don't know much ...
Whether jessica is happy with this we will never know. jessica does not respond -by nature? -.
1 matches
Hey there, Pillhead-
I turn to Alex for your font request, as he is master af all web.
As for your question about the 04 series, this is an attribute of all bitmap fonts, which are indended to be displayed at low point sizes. The reason for their distortion at higher points is not exactly starightforward, but I will give it my best shot.
Bitmap fonts are designed according to a pixel-perfect set of rules and guidelines (this varies between both fonts and designers). Because, as a rule, text and display fonts are designed in a less precise manner, they will display seemingly perfectly at almost any point size. A display (that is, monitor) has only a certain amount of pixels per inch to work with, and therefore will sometimes overcompensate with which pixels it decides to turn black when displaying a bitmap font at higher point sizes. Thus the resulting distortion. Displays will still do this with "other" fonts, don't get me wrong, but the distortion is less evident because of the very nature of display and text fonts. Bitmap fonts, in the .ttf format, will print at any point size without distortion.
I apologize for the complexity of that little lecture, but it was off the cuff and unrefined. Given a few years I could probably pare it down and make it a little less impenetrable.
TTFN,
-Třrnquist
|
Related keywords (10)
|
